google adsense check
Home STOCKS Fitch Assigns Adani Ports' USD750 Million Notes 'BBB-' Final Rating; Outlook Negative

Fitch Assigns Adani Ports’ USD750 Million Notes ‘BBB-‘ Final Rating; Outlook Negative

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Fitch Ratings-Hong Kong-29 July 2020: Fitch Ratings has assigned India-based port operator Adani (NS:) Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited’s (APSEZ, BBB-/Negative) USD750 million senior unsecured notes due 2027 a final rating of ‘BBB-‘ with a Negative Outlook. The proceeds will be used primarily for refinancing the debt of Krishnapatnam Port Company Limited (KPCL) upon the completion of APSEZ’s acquisition of the company. The new issue is ranked pari passu with APSEZ’s existing US dollar senior unsecured notes. The final rating follows the receipt of documents conforming to information already received and is in line with the expected rating assigned on 12 July 2020. RATING RATIONALE APSEZ announced its acquisition of a 75% stake in KPCL in January 2020, which will be fully funded through internal accruals and existing cash balances. APSEZ will consolidate KPCL’s debt of INR62 billion into its balance sheet and incur INR55 billion in cash outflow to fund the acquisition, which will not affect APSEZ’s rating, in our view. The Competition Commission of India on 23 July 2020 approved APSEZ’s acquisition of KPCL. APSEZ is in the process of obtaining other regulatory approvals including from the Andhra Pradesh state government. We have not included the acquisition or EBITDA contribution from KPCL in our forecast due to the pending regulatory approvals. However, the increased debt as a result of the bond issuance will not have a material impact on the credit profile of APSEZ as additional indebtedness is largely offset by an increase in its cash balance. If the acquisition does not proceed, APSEZ could use the cash balance to fund its other capex, investment or refinance its other upcoming debt maturities. APSEZ’s ratings are constrained by the sovereign’s Country Ceiling. Should India’s ‘BBB-‘ Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) be downgraded, the ‘BBB-‘ Country Ceiling may also be revised down in tandem. The Negative Outlook reflects the heightened probability that India’s Country Ceiling could be lowered – which would then constrain APSEZ’s ratings. APSEZ’s underlying rating is ‘bbb’. KEY RATING DRIVERS Risk Assessment: Fitch assesses APSEZ’s revenue risk (volume) as ‘Stronger’, revenue risk (price) as ‘Midrange’, infrastructure development and renewal as ‘Stronger’ and debt structure as ‘Midrange’. For more information, see the last full review published 16 June 2020 at PEER GROUP PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) (Pelindo II, BBB/Stable; underlying credit rating: bbb) is the largest container port operator in Indonesia. APSEZ benefits from cargo under long-term contracts, which accounts for about 60% of total traffic. On the other hand, Pelindo II benefits from stable rental income from joint ventures, which accounts for about 60% of its EBITDA. We forecast average leverage of 3.2x during the forecast period for APSEZ under our rating case, a level similar to that of Pelindo II. ABP Finance Plc (A-/Stable) is the financing vehicle of Associated British Ports (ABP), which operates 21 ports in the UK. ABP benefits from its perpetual ownership of port assets and its landlord-tenant business model, with long-term take-or-pay contracts representing around 45% of revenue in 2018. APSEZ benefits from long-term cargo but does not own on freehold its ports like ABP. ABP’s leverage is higher than that of APSEZ, although ABP’s debt includes extensive financial covenants, securities and other creditor-protective features. RATING SENSITIVITIES Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade: – We do not expect positive rating action in the near term – A revision in the Indian sovereign’s Outlook to Stable would indicate that the Country Ceiling is likely to remain at ‘BBB-‘ and therefore our Outlook on APSEZ would also be revised to Stable Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade: – Prolonged deterioration of Fitch’s rating case adjusted net debt/EBITDAR to above 5.0x due to underperformance or a material reduction of average concession life – Lowering of India’s Country Ceiling to ‘BB+’ Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from ‘AAA’ to ‘D’. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit []. TRANSACTION SUMMARY APSEZ accounted for approximately 17% of India’s seaborne cargo in the financial year ended March 2020 (FY20). It operates a string of 10 ports across India. Its most important port, Mundra Port, contributed 62% of the group’s throughput and serves as the gateway to landlocked north-western India. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The Fitch base case assumes a 6% throughput decline in FY21 and an 11% rebound in FY22, in line with management’s forecast. We assume throughput will rise by 6.7% per annum thereafter, in line with the CAGR of Indian GDP in the past five years. It implies a throughput CAGR of about 5% between FY20 and FY25. We have incorporated management’s expectation of a delay in some capex in FY21. Our base case assumes INR123 billion in capex in FY21-FY25, of which INR23 billion will be spent in FY21. We also assume dividend payouts will be 20% of profit after tax (PAT) in FY21 and 25% thereafter. Our base case generates an average adjusted net debt/EBITDAR of 2.5x with a maximum of 3.2x. Fitch’s rating case assumes a 10% throughput decline in FY21, followed by a 10% recovery in FY22. We have applied a 10% haircut to the base case’s throughput growth assumption thereafter. It implies a throughput CAGR of about 3% between FY20 and FY25. We also applied 10% stress to our base-case capex assumption. We assume dividend payouts will be 20% of PAT in FY21 and 25% afterwards. Our rating case generates an average adjusted net debt/EBITDAR of 3.2x with a maximum of 3.6x. Date of Relevant Committee 03 July 2020 REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria. PUBLIC RATINGS WITH CREDIT LINKAGE TO OTHER RATINGS APSEZ’s underlying rating of ‘bbb’ is capped by India’s Country Ceiling of ‘BBB-‘. Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited —-Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited/Debt/1 LT; Long Term Rating ——USD 750 mln 4.2% bond/note 04-Aug-2027 00652MAG7; Long Term Rating; New Rating; BBB-; RO:Neg Contacts: Primary Rating Analyst Louis Pang, FRM Associate Director +852 2263 9992 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F Man Yee Building 60-68 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong Secondary Rating Analyst Sunny Huang, CPA Director +852 2263 9979 Committee Chairperson Sajal Kishore, Senior Director +65 6796 7095 Media Relations: Alanis Ko, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9953, Email: Wai Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Infrastructure and Project Finance Rating Criteria (pub. 24 Mar 2020) (including rating assumption sensitivity) ( Ports Rating Criteria (pub. 24 Mar 2020) (including rating assumption sensitivity) ( Applicable Model Numbers in parentheses accompanying applicable model(s) contain hyperlinks to criteria providing description of model(s). Corporate Monitoring & Forecasting Model (COMFORT Model), v7.9.0 (1 ( Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form ( Solicitation Status ( Endorsement Status ( Endorsement Policy ( ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS (HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS). IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT ( DETAILS FITCH’S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY ( FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH RATINGS WEBSITE. Copyright © 2020 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the “NRSRO”). While certain of the NRSRO’s credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see, other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the “non-NRSROs”) and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Temporary-GE Electrical power India Ltd – Co Analyzing Parent’s Decision To Exit From Coal Ability Market New Builds

Risk Disclosure: Fusion Media will not acknowledge any liability for loss or...

Subscribe to Angel Broking: Ajcon World

Ajcon World wide has appear out with its report on Angel Broking. The investigation business has advisable to ''Subscribe'' the...

Recent Comments